| Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) | Links utili | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Il rompicapo degli investimenti etici - 10 ottobre 2007 | Ultimi articoli | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
But
there is a potential problem. Can ethical investors make decent
profits? You might think that ethical investing strategies
under-perform, but actually the evidence suggests that you can make a
good return from ethical investing. However,
before I look at performance figures, we should take a quick look at what "ethical
investing" means. In
this article I'm going to be focusing on investing via unit trusts, and
in that sphere, different ethical funds have different
approaches or mandates. But whatever the mandate, an ethical fund will
avoid companies that fall outside its mandate. For instance, the
well-known Jupiter Ecology fund has a policy of investing worldwide in
companies which demonstrate a positive commitment to the long-term
protection of the environment, and screening out those that don't. Following
this to a logical conclusion, it also means the fund manager must sell shares
which no longer meet the ethical criteria of the fund. It's this
restrictive investment policy which leads some observers to
conclude that ethical funds must, by their very nature, underperform. It's
true traditional ethical funds routinely reject the stock of
companies involved with tobacco, alcohol and gambling, to name a few,
and undeniably there are some very profitable companies operating in
these sectors. Non-ethical fund managers may have the advantage of
a greater universe of stocks at their disposal. But I would argue that a
fund which is managed ethically runs under a no more restrictive policy
than one which can only invest in a specific geographic region or say,
solely in undervalued companies. There
is also a lot of sense in the notion that a strong social, environmental
or ethical record can boost shareholder value as a more ethical approach
can boost brand loyalty and avoid reputational risk. More
recently, ethical investment has developed to encompass a strategy
called ‘engagement'. Instead of excluding companies which fail ethical
criteria, some funds actively invest in companies with less than perfect
ethical records with a view to using their clout as institutional
investors to drive improvements in their business practices. It
has been argued that engagement is nothing more than a diluted version
of ethical investing, but by excluding unethical companies the status
quo is preserved. Engagement is all about encouraging corporate social
change. But
to return to the main question, do ethical funds always perform
poorly? I'm not going to argue the current best-performing funds
are ethical because that isn't true. Many of the best-peforming funds
over the last year have been focused on emerging markets. But
equally you won't find all the ethical funds languishing at the bottom
of the performance tables either. The table below shows how ethical
funds compare against their non-ethical counterparts, index
trackers
and the FTSE 100. Ethical
Funds Versus Non-ethical
Source:
Lipper Hindsight/Investment, Life & Pensions Moneyfacts. % growth as
at 1 July 2007. So
on average ethical funds have done pretty well over the short term.
They've beaten non-ethical funds over the last one and three years, and
even beat the Foolish favourite, the index tracker, over the last year.
Admittedly, ethical funds have fallen behind non-ethical funds over five
and ten year periods, but there is less than a 6% differential betweeen
the two over the last decade which you might feel is an acceptable lag
for keeping your conscience intact. I think well managed ethical funds are certainly capable of holding their own. If you've always thought investing ethically and making money mix like oil and water, then it's time to think again" |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Articolo, documenti e leggi utili | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Copyright © 1999-2007
Tutti i diritti riservati.